Liberty Unchained

Once the meeting with my daughters soon to be school principal was arranged, I figured that I had a couple of options:

• Take a day or two out of my busy schedule to hit the Olympia law library and dig up case law from the appellate and supreme courts here in Washington
• Review and decipher the convoluted moral mess we call the Washington Administrative Code
• Keep working on my various projects and rely on a couple of simple principles to get me through it.

The point of digging up appellate and supreme court decisions from Washington courts would be to show up and provide bonafide proof that there is absolutely no requirement in our system of law for anyone to give out a bunch of information or sign a registration contract. When you go into a district court, you bring higher court rulings to make the district court do what you require.

The point of hashing through the WAC ( again ) is that it is not called “Code” for nothing. It is far better to go to the enacting legislation than it is to read that smelly pile of gibberish. Of course, there can not be any enacting legislation created by the “Secretary of Education” as there is no lawful grant of power for that office to make laws which apply to the general population.

Anything “enacted” by the Secretary of Education can only apply to one of the following two groups:

1. those working in the education framework
2. those who sign registration contracts with the education framework.

Even if I go through it and show that what I say is true, most people will still not be able to see it because they have been trained not to.

Beside the mentioned problems, both would be taking an adversarial stance…and I have no wish to take such a stance. Instead, I will be taking the third option and agreeing with all claims made, upon the condition that such claims be proven to my satisfaction.

You see, when some government official walks up to you and claims, “You must do X, Y, and Z”, rather than disagree ( the first requirement for a lawsuit ), you should simply agree upon proof of claim. Doing so shows good faith on your part while leaving the burden of proof in theirs. Of course, you need to be able to tell what real proof is…and to do that, one need look no further than the constitutions.

Now, I don’t have much faith in the constitutions ( federal or state ) because I never signed them and I don’t really believe that other people can sign them in my stead. But, let us leave that aside and pretend that both the state and federal constitutions are valid and binding upon both the general populace and those who call themselves government.

Looking closely, one finds that only one group can create law…and that group is not “Federal and State executive branch agencies” or even “The executive of the state or federal government”. It turns out ( don’t laugh ) that only the legislature can create law. And what is more, for a legislatively created law to be valid, it must not violate the constitutions ( state or federal here in washington ).

So, my “crazy” plan is quite simple. Offer to do all that is claimed to be required as soon as the valid contract between me and the department of education is presented or as soon as the ( seemingly missing ) part of the constitution of washington granting general law making power to the secretary of education is shown to me. Those are the only two valid ways that the department of education could make me do anything, provided of course that the constitution is valid…which those calling themselves “the state” must pretend in order to hold up the illusion that they have any right to tell us what to do. Well, they could hoodwink me…but I think they have already failed there.

Pretty simple stuff really, but somehow we never learned such things from the secretary of educations minions…go figure.

The harder part is knowing how to hold their feet to the fire should they decide to put things to the test. To do such a thing, one needs to know what court ( if any ) to bring suit in and what cause(s) of action to bring suit under.

I must have been sleeping in my american law classes as somehow I missed being taught how to go about suing unruly officials who abuse their status under color of law…oh right, I was not asleep…there simply is no such law. Silly me. But maybe I picked up such knowledge elsewhere…who knows?

Stay tuned for the (possible) conclusion tomorrow afternoon. Personally I would like to be done with the matter as I have a life to live…but I certainly am not going to lie down.